The Modern Dimensions of Petroleum Structural Geology and Suggestions for Strengthening the Link between Academia and Industry

by Peter Hennings

On behalf of the Structural Geology and Tectonics Division I thank GSA for the opportunity to contribute to the Speaking of Geoscience blog commemorating GSA’s 125th year. This contribution is a discussion of what constitutes the modern dimensions of Petroleum Structural Geology, the skills and experience that are desired in its practitioners, and recommendations for how the links between academia and industry can be made more productive. My principal ambition in writing this blog is to recognize that, while the Structural Geology and Tectonics Division is GSA’s largest division, there is an even larger group of structural geology professionals in the petroleum industry, many of whom have limited association with GSA.  The lines of communication between this group and GSA need strengthening.

One hundred and twenty five years ago the petroleum industry in North America was an awakening giant. Oil was flowing from surface anticlines in the foothills of the western Appalachians and the well control incident at the crest of a salt dome at what would become Spindletop Field in southeastern Texas was still 13 years away1.  After decades of declining production in North America, 2012 saw the largest production increase ever2 and, as a surprise to most watchers, the prospect of an energy independent and energy secure future for North America is predicted within most of our lifetimes3. While the traditional applications of qualitative and descriptive structural geology remain central to the story of industry development the quantitative and predictive aspects are growing in importance as the industry more routinely ventures into physically and environmentally challenging realms.

Petroleum Structure and Geomechanics (PSG) is one of the most important discipline areas in the petroleum industry. It is the science and application of analyzing deformation and stress within the petroleum realm by integrating outcrop, geophysical, remote sensing, petrophysical, core, laboratory rock strength, and fluid flow data. It spans spatial scales from tectonic reconstructions to SEM-imaged rock-fabrics. The outcome of this pursuit leads to a more complete understanding of the creation of petroleum habitats, formation and evolution of petroleum systems, formation and architecture of structural traps, and the internal architecture and stress state of reservoirs and their overburden.

While the need for customary applications of structural geology in the petroleum industry has not waned, in the last few years the importance of reservoir geomechanics has increased many-fold. Topics in this area include predicting the pore pressure environment; characterizing and modeling the coupled nature of deformation and fluid flow in stress-sensitive, faulted, fractured and compliant reservoirs; predicting and managing production-related deformation in reservoirs and their overburden to ensure operational integrity; deriving detailed models of subsurface stress and rock strength for horizontal drilling and stimulation of low permeability reservoirs; analyzing laboratory rock mechanics data and many other topics.

It is quite impossible for single individuals to be an expert in all of the topics stated above but a broad yet quantitative technical background is important for success as a PSG practitioner. It is important for PSG types to have as much experience as possible in these topics:

  • structural analysis in the brittle realm
  • global tectonics and continental margin geodynamics
  • seismic interpretation
  • outcrop characterization and mapping
  • development of 3D digital models
  • physical rock mechanics and reservoir geomechanics
  • hydrology and fluid flow in porous media
  • crustal heat flow
  • remote sensing
  • potential field interpretation
  • seismology
  • pore pressure

If at all possible, it is also valuable to have awareness of the topics of borehole petrophysics and reservoir engineering. Students are advised to not bypass any of the base sciences and obtain a firm background in chemistry, physics, calculus, statistics, and computational analysis.

With a view to strengthening the relationship between industry and academia, here are some suggestions for geoscience faculty: encourage your students to seek industry internships and careers, ask former students if you can visit them in industry for a week, invite company visits to your department, form and participate in an industry advisory board in your department and utilize alumni, seek an industry visit during a sabbatical, take short courses that industry people attend or teach, encourage industry-applied research in your department and among your peers, attend AAPG/SEG/SPE meetings and serve on their committees, promote professional student chapter associations and distinguished lecture programs in geoscience and related disciplines.

Industry professionals are encouraged to attend GSA meetings, visit academic departments and offer seminars and short courses, strive to make subsurface datasets available for research and teaching purposes, make time available for journal editorial service, and offer to serve on graduate student committees.

The Speaking of Geoscience blog offers a convenient forum to expand on this topic with additional discussion. I am interested in hearing what others think about the modern dimensions of Petroleum Structural Geology and how the links between industry and academia can be strengthened.

References

1. History of the petroleum industry in the United States

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_petroleum_industry_in_the_United_States

2. U.S. Oil-Production Rise Is Fastest Ever

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323468604578249621718888086.html

3. Spreading an Energy Revolution

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/06/opinion/global/spreading-an-energy-revolution.html

Peter Hennings is Manager of Structure and Geomechanics at ConocoPhillips, consulting professor of Geophysics at Stanford, adjunct professor of Geology at the University of Wyoming and is a GSA Honorary Fellow.

11 thoughts on “The Modern Dimensions of Petroleum Structural Geology and Suggestions for Strengthening the Link between Academia and Industry

  1. Just desire to say your article is as amazing. The clarity in
    your publish is simply nice and that i could assume you’re a professional in this subject. Well together with your permission let me to grasp your feed to stay updated with coming near near post. Thank you one million and please continue the enjoyable work.

  2. Hi everyone. I used to hear someone to say about four dimensions traps in Petroleum Geology. I don’t know what is the four dimensions traps?
    I hope everybody help me. please send to my email: muoind84@gmail.com
    Thank you so much.

    1. Good question. The forth dimension is time. Traps and petroleum systems evolve in many ways over geologic time (millions of years) and reservoirs under production evolve in human time scales (months to years). Analysis of the structural architecture and mechanical characteristics of petroleum traps and reservoirs must address the time-bound aspect of geometric and material property evolution.

  3. I strongly agree with Peter on this. I identified the need for structural geologists with a background in brittle fracture mechanics, reservoir geomechanics and fluid flow early in my masters. I then taylored my PhD to make myself marketable to exactly this skill set. I really feel that this background has opened a lot of opportunity, and I am glad to see that ConocoPhillips is of the same mind set!

    At the same time, I am frustrated at the lack of industry presence in so many Geoscience departments! There is definitely a wealth of knowledge to be shared by industry professionals to undergrads and grads unsure of what to do with a geoscience degree.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s